March 2008 Edition
SPOTLIGHT: CAD/CAM
Blue Chip Investment
Through the peaks and valleys of business, shop owners found a program to keep the company from folding
After losing a major customer, Blue Chip Engineering had to diversify its client base by moving into milling high-performance racing engines
Rick Denny and his step-son, Mike Anderson, have gone through
some ups and downs since starting Blue Chip Engineering, Inc., Ramsey, MN, in
1994. The majority of Blue Chip's business is doing overflow work for other
shops, making their problem parts; work which they have found to be
unpredictable and unstable. But, their bumpy road ultimately led them to
GibbsCAM from Gibbs and Associates, Moorpark, CA, and from there, continued
success.
From their meager beginnings in a rented space just four feet
wider than their vertical machining center, within a year, Denny and Andersen
built their own rotary axis and gained some flexibility. By 2003, Blue Chip was
a success, with 20 employees keeping 10 CNCs busy, including two 5-axis VMCs, a
lathe, and a programmable CMM, in its own 4,600 ft2 facility.
Then disaster hit the shop when a key medical device customer
decided stamping components would be more economical than machining. The loss of
the customer nearly put Blue Chip out of business.
Unable to find replacement work, Blue Chip had to lay off
half of its staff. That's when Denny and Andersen decided to find more complex
work not likely to be lost to a simpler manufacturing process or to offshore
competition.
Past Decisions Foster Future Success
Luckily, Blue Chip was prepared to do that type of work.
Denny had decades of experience working in shops and both he and Anderson had
been introduced to GibbsCAM. With that experience and knowledge, they applied
themselves to getting more complex jobs.
In 2000, Blue Chip accepted an engineering project to develop
a machining process including the fixturing, cut direction, cutter sizes, and
speeds and feeds to machine boat propellers.
"Although we had the machine tools and experience," Denny
said, "we lacked the software to machine the hydrodynamic surfaces."
"We used a couple of other CAM systems before," Andersen
said, "and they worked well for what we had been doing, but we needed something
powerful, so we got GibbsCAM."
They used the computer-aided manufacturing software to
extract geometry from the CAD model, and made tool offsets and toolpaths. Then,
Andersen developed a fixturing method to hold the work piece, not an easy task
for propeller machining. The fixturing included the use of GibbsCAM to model and
machine three helical clamps to hold the ends of the blades with set screws. For
the props, they chose the application's two-curve flow-machining routine, which
allows 3D cutting along surface flow lines. This also saves time on the machine
and results in a superior surface finish.
Transitioning from traditional manual customization to CAM posed the challenge of creating toolpaths without gouging. Blue Chip Engineering used GibbsCAM to pilot the cutting paths before it started producing chips.
"Like the GibbsCAM spiral cutting routine, flow-line
machining eliminated the step-overs of lace cutting and the rougher finish these
methods leave," Anderson said. "It also made our job faster and easier. The
fixturing and toolpaths let us machine both sides of a propeller in a single
load at 400 ipm, the fastest the machine would go."
Using castings made for larger props, Blue Chip machined 20
with sufficient precision to eliminate the time and effort of traditional
balancing work. Also, depending on the boating application, the process
eliminated or reduced hand polishing.
The job went well for Blue Chip and the customer, who added
high-speed machining centers, achieved much higher machining speeds, and had an
unexpected benefit: it introduced a new product line of machined propellers.
Since the contract was for development of a process for the
customer to implement themselves, it did not result in more machining work for
Blue Chip, but it prepared the company for its challenge three years later.
"The propeller work forced us to dive into GibbsCAM and learn
everything we could; the same way we did with SolidWorks," Andersen said. "We
stopped using our previous CAM software and started using GibbsCAM for
everything."
Performance Squeeze
Although Blue Chip had only half the number of employees it
did at its peak, Denny and Anderson had sufficient confidence in the Gibbs
software to try new work outside of its usual line. The company prospected for
complex and challenging surface machining opportunities, specifically with
engines.
"I used to drag race," Denny said, "and I enjoy squeezing
performance from engines. I've always wanted to machine cylinder-head ports.
Customizing ports involves complex surfaces and handwork that begs to be
eliminated."
Blue Chip had done some machining work for Hi Tech
Motorsport, Elk River, MN, a local performance shop, making throttle bodies from
raw stock. In 2006, Brian Ebert, a principal of Hi Tech Motorsport, asked Blue
Chip to machine ports on Corvette LS1 engine cylinder heads. The re-ported
heads, in combination with different Hi Tech manifolds, cams, and throttle
bodies, boosts a stock engine from 350 to 550 horsepower.
The parts were identical, and saved nine hours per head, or about 200 hours total
Hi Tech had been customizing the heads through traditional
hand grinding of the intake and exhaust ports, which presents problems that
machining can solve. With hand grinders, "porting" a head is a 12-hour job, and
because it's done manually, there is no consistency from port to port. More
challenging is the replication of a successful job there is no way to make an
identical set of heads by hand.
"Machining ports is difficult because of the compound angles,
the required length of cutters, and the tight space," Denny said. "The tool has
to go deep inside without hitting sidewalls or the tool holder, machine at depth
without chatter, and then retract without gouging or shanking, which is the
hardest part. GibbsCAM lets us add multiple 3D lines for the cutter to follow as
it retracts from the cut."
"I didn't know how to drive the tool without hitting
everything on the way in or out," Denny said about his first experiences with
machining the head, "but Gibbs' tech support gave me the answer. Support was one
of the reasons we chose Gibbs when we got the prop job seven years ago."
Making the Automation Move
Hi Tech Motorsport hand-ported one intake, one exhaust, and
one combustion chamber, then molded parts from the chambers, had them digitized
with a laser scanner, and translated the data into surfaces. Blue Chip imported
these into SolidWorks to build a solid CAD model of a cylinder head. It opened
the file in GibbsCAM, where it used both solids and surfaces for machining, and
the rest of the cylinder head for positioning.
The plan was to use the GibbsCAM Advanced CS module for
programming.
By using a 3D model of tools and materials, Blue Chip Engineering was able to make sure that the last port milling job was identical to the first, something not attainable when the customer milled the engine parts by hand
"It's all we need if we're are not doing 5-axis
simultaneous," Denny said. "We don't have the 5-axis module, so I decided to
clamp the part at the different angles, machine a patch surface, rotate to
another angle, machine a patch, and so forth. This minimized chatter, since both
the tilt and rotary axes are clamped during machining."
A feature of the CAM software offsets the toolpath from the
surface, and using toolpath geometry, points, and lines drives the cutter.
Combined with surface flow machining, it worked well for Denny. He used the
software's Transform Toolpath function and copied all the toolpaths to the
individual four points he created for each cylinder, to produce identical
toolpaths for every port. The job required only five programs to machine the
intake, exhaust, and combustion chambers.
It would not have been as easy, had he not relied on the
Gouge Checking feature of GibbsCAM, which he said eliminated a lot of scrap, and
the feature that Blue Chip considers the best: interactive visualization.
"We rely on the Cut Part Rendering function for everything,"
Andersen said. "We have the confidence to know that if it looks right and
doesn't gouge in simulation, it's going to be right and won't gouge on the
machine. There are rare exceptions, so we're cautious, but confident, at the
machine."
"We can look down the port and see if you're going to shank
the cutter," Denny said. "The Form Tool function shows the shape of the cutter,
which protrudes about 4.5" from the holder, starting with a 1/2" diameter shank,
tapering to 3/8" diameter, and ending with a 1/2" ball.
"I could rotate to an angle, pick a surface patch, then drive
the cutter into the port, and then out. That's all I needed. I visually created
the toolpath, rotating my coordinate system about the vertical or horizontal
axes, to get a clear path without collisions. I had few numbers to enter because
I moved the cutter visually. The visual feedback is powerful, useful, and
intuitive. On the first try, I could get to an angle where the tool wouldn't
gouge or shank. With Cut Part Rendering I confirmed what I programmed. My first
part was good."
A newer feature, Flash CPR, shows a translucent part model,
in registration with the rendered cut part; useful in executing the job.
"I can look interactively at the part from any angle," Denny
said. "I looked at the ports from the side to check surfaces, from the ends to
check for gouging on side walls, and from every direction to make sure the
cutter wasn't hitting anything as it went into the heads and retracted. For this
porting job, it was indispensable."
Andersen and Denny also discovered a function in this feature
which let them check their work.
"We display the rendered cut part on the part model and then
toggle the cut part on and off," Andersen said. "By watching for apparent motion
each time the overlay appears, you can find the most hidden errors or deviations
from the part surface. If nothing appears to move, the part's good."
The cylinder heads were machined on a 5-axis VMC, using the
rotary axis for positioning. After seeing and testing the first pair of heads,
Hi Tech Motorsport awarded Blue Chip the job of porting 22 heads, which Blue
Chip delivered within two weeks. The parts were identical, and saved nine hours
per head, or about 200 hours total.
"Hi Tech was as pleased as we were," Denny said.
The Insurance of Difficult Work
To eliminate high- and low-volume work cycles, Denny and
Andersen seek more OEM work. As they work toward that goal, they continue
diversification across industries, taking on the difficult work as insurance
against alternative manufacturing methods and foreign competition.
They have found work in medical instrument and orthopedic
implant manufacturing, gained a foothold in automotive and motorcycle part
manufacturing, are doing some rapid-prototype machining, added an artist who
provides sculpture machining work to their list of customers, and have made
aerospace manufacturing the largest portion of their business, with a solid,
long-term defense contract.
Denny and Andersen said that GibbsCAM and other technology
helped Blue Chip survive through diversification, some difficult work, some fun
projects, and shifting from one industry to another as some projects end and
others ramps up.
"If we hadn't invested in the program,
we'd be out of business," Denny said. Gibbs and Associates
Visit www.rsleads.com/803mn-220 for more information
What do you think?
Will the information in this article increase efficiency or save time, money, or effort? Let us know by e-mail from our website at
www.ModernApplicationsNews.com or e-mail the editor at
pnofel@nelsonpub.com.
Easy To Use CAM Package
InventorCAM 2008 integrates into Inventor 2008. The
single-window user interface and associativity between the CAD model and NC tool
path provides a short learning curve according to the manufacturer, and an
efficient flow from the 3D design model to the machined part. This version
provides a manufacturing solution with enhanced user friendliness, more
automation features, and additional interactive CAM functions. The 3D
SpaceNavigator mouse is supported as a new input device. The new version also
contains a framework to integrate external application programs, such as the
external tool library from Vardex. SolidCAM, Croydon, PA
For more information (click here)
A Wizard at Multi-view Doc Generation
PartMaker Version 8.5 marks the introduction of the PartMaker
Documentation Wizard, an optional module which lets users create, preview, and
print documents with multiple views. Among other improvements, the update
features enhancements to the PartMaker Full Machine Simulation module. It also
lets users create dimensioned drawings. Users can create horizontal, vertical,
linear, circular, and angular dimensions by picking geometric entities.
Delcam International Inc., Windsor, Ontario, Canada
For more information (click here)
Software Predicts Tools Usage
T-Flex CAD has an adaptable user interface to suit the
preferable working method, the current type of project, or the current project
phase. T-Flex 11 offers a range of functions from 2D drawing and 3D design to
manufacturing, finite element, and dynamic analysis. The workflow predicts which
tools users need in the context of the specific task undertaken and makes them
available. The integrated tutorial guides users through the program's
functionality in a step-by-step process. Top Systems, Ltd., Moscow, Russian
Federation
For more information (click here)